<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pelley Law, PLLC  &#124; Seattle Criminal Defense Attorney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com</link>
	<description>Criminal Defense Lawyer for Seattle, Washington. Felony and misdemeanor attorney, working to achieve the best results.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:25:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Interview on Medical Cannabis Legal Issues in 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/interview-on-medical-cannabis-legal-issues-in-2012</link>
		<comments>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/interview-on-medical-cannabis-legal-issues-in-2012#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Pelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/?p=2261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medical Cannabis in Washington State 2012 Legal Issues<br />
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/interview-on-medical-cannabis-legal-issues-in-2012/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US v McKinley</title>
		<link>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/us-v-mckinley</link>
		<comments>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/us-v-mckinley#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 18:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Pelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/?p=2206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An exciting ruling for Medical Cannabis Lawyers came out of Eastern District of Washington. You can read coverage from other bloggers here. In short, the Judge held that medical cannabis is decriminalized and that a plain and ordinary reading of the statute provides protection from arrest and prosecution. You can read the defense motion here and the court&#8217;s ruling here. It was a bold argument made by defense counsel Richard Wall. It was also a sensible ruling by Judge Nielsen. ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/us-v-mckinley/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Law Update 11-25-11</title>
		<link>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-11-25-11</link>
		<comments>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-11-25-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Pelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonstatecriminaldefense.com/?p=449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Desk of Dena Alo-Colbeck<br />
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week:<br />
Washington State Law<br />
Division One Court of Appeals<br />
State v. Duncalf:  The Court upheld the jury’s general and special verdicts, finding that the two could be harmonized.  The Court reasoned that the special verdict, a finding of an aggravating circumstance that authorized the imposition of an exceptional sentence, could be harmonized with the general verdict convicting Mr. Duncalf of a crime inferior in degree ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-11-25-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Law Update 11-18-11</title>
		<link>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-11-18-11</link>
		<comments>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-11-18-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Pelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonstatecriminaldefense.com/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following criminal cases of note were decided this week:<br />
&#160;<br />
Washington State Law<br />
&#160;<br />
Washington State Supreme Court <br />
 <br />
 Personal Restraint of Coats:   The court reviewed a challenge to Mr. Coats’ judgment and sentence that was brought fourteen years after the fact when Mr. Coats claimed that the document erroneously states that the maximum sentence for the crime committed, conspiracy to commit murder, was life in prison. The Court found that there was in fact an error in ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-11-18-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminal Case Law Update 11-11-11</title>
		<link>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/criminal-case-law-update-11-11-11</link>
		<comments>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/criminal-case-law-update-11-11-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Pelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonstatecriminaldefense.com/?p=443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following criminal cases of note were decided this week:<br />
Washington State Law<br />
Washington State Supreme Court<br />
In Re Detention of Danforth:  The Court found that Mr. Danforth’s actions in describing to an officer in the King County Sheriff’s Office his history of sex offenses and explicitly outlining his plans to molest boys and have intercourse with a child reasonably could be interpreted as a threat.  The Court reasoned that Mr. Danforth’s repeated statements that he would act ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/criminal-case-law-update-11-11-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Law Update, Week Ending 11-3-11</title>
		<link>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-week-ending-11-3-11</link>
		<comments>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-week-ending-11-3-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 21:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Pelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonstatecriminaldefense.com/?p=440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Desk of Dena Alo-Colbeck<br />
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week:<br />
Washington State Law<br />
Washington State Supreme Court<br />
State v. Immelt: The Court overturned Ms. Immelt’s conviction for violating a noise ordinance by sounding her car horn at length in front of a neighbor’s house in the early morning hours.  The Court found that the ordinance, which prohibits horn honking for a purpose other than public safety, or originating from an officially sanctioned parade ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-week-ending-11-3-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Law Update, Week Ending 10-21-11</title>
		<link>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-week-ending-10-21-11</link>
		<comments>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-week-ending-10-21-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Pelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonstatecriminaldefense.com/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck<br />
“Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys”<br />
Washington State Law<br />
Washington State Supreme Court <br />
State v. Ibarra-Cisneros:  The court reversed Mr. Ibarra-Cisneros’s conviction for possession of cocaine based on an unlawful search of his brother and co-defendant’s cell phone. The Court agreed with the Court of Appeals that the search of Mr. Ibarra-Cisneros’ home was unlawful and the subsequent evidence seized as a result of the subsequent search of the cell phone ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-week-ending-10-21-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Law Update, Week Ending 10-14-11</title>
		<link>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-week-ending-10-14-11</link>
		<comments>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-week-ending-10-14-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Pelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonstatecriminaldefense.com/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck<br />
“Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys”<br />
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week:<br />
Washington State Law<br />
Washington State Supreme Court<br />
State v. Perez-Valdez: The Court affirmed Mr. Perez-Valdez’s conviction for one count of second degree rape of a child and one count of third degree rape of a child, finding proper two evidentiary decisions made by the trial court.  The Court determined that the defense called witnesses who ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-week-ending-10-14-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Law Update, Week Ending 10-7-11</title>
		<link>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-week-ending-10-7-11</link>
		<comments>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-week-ending-10-7-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Pelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonstatecriminaldefense.com/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck<br />
“Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys”<br />
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week:<br />
Washington State Law<br />
Washington State Supreme Court <br />
State v. Robinson: The Court found that the trial court properly allowed Mr. Robinson to withdraw his guilty plea after learning that his juvenile convictions, which he had believe had washed out, would in fact count toward his offender score, significantly increasing his statutory sentencing range.  The ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/case-law-update-week-ending-10-7-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DV Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/dv-policy</link>
		<comments>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/dv-policy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Pelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonstatecriminaldefense.com/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An accusation of domestic violence can have a devastating impact on a family. The court will usually include a no-contact order if there has been accusation of domestic violence by the Prosecutor. The first condition of the order is that there can be no contact (in person, via phone, text, etc) with the alleged victim. It will often include that the person cannot go near the home or work place of the person the court believes is in danger. Importantly, ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pelleylawgroup.com/seattle-criminal-defenseblog/dv-policy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
